Financial and Credit Activities: Problems of Theory and Practice

Title	Financial and Credit Activities: Problems of Theory and Practice
Class	Scholar Publisher
URL	https://fkd.net.ua/
Owner	Two persons (Maryna and Oleksandr) are the solely owners of Fintechalliance LLC, which is the publisher of journals and has all related IP rights.
Address	highway Kharkivska, bldg. 180/21, Kyiv, 02121, Ukraine
Copyright and Licensing	https://fkd.net.ua/index.php/fkd/open_access_and_copyrights
Copyright and Licensing Policy	All articles published by this Publication are published under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain copyright to their articles. We encourage authors to deposit (self-archive) any version of their article.
Complaint email	https://fkd.net.ua/index.php/fkd/resolving_complaints
Complaint policy	https://fkd.net.ua/index.php/fkd/resolving_complaints
Publication charge link	https://fkd.net.ua/index.php/fkd/COST
Publication charge policy	We provide full open access to all research materials published by us. This allows users to freely access, view, redistribute and re-use the published content. Therefore, we collect Article Processing Charge (APC) to pay for all necessary editorial process expenses. The fee is 500 USD. The APC is payable after acceptance of the article and prior to publication. This Publication believes in creating equal publishing opportunities to all researchers and scholars and offers 20% discount to those authors who are affiliated with low or lower-middle income countries based on the World Bank country income classification.
OASPA Compliant OA Journals	1
OA articles approx. number in 12 months	302
Peer review process	https://fkd.net.ua/index.php/fkd/reviewer_guidelines https://fkd.net.ua/index.php/fkd/editorial_process
Peer review policy	Peer review process may be lengthy (typically up to 2 month) and is unique to each submission. Two reviewers are assigned to each submission, who are selected from internal database, editorial board members or through web-search to find new relevant and qualified scientists/researchers. Publication uses double anonymized peer review process, therefore, all information about authors and reviewers is confidential and is not available to each other. Authors are not able to recommend reviewers for their own work. As result of this stage reviewer could make one of the following decisions: ▪ reject acticle; ▪ revise and resubmit; ▪ accept without changes. Above recommendations are anonymously communicated to Authors and are reviewed by the editor prior to reaching final decision on article publishing. If editor suspects any reviewer bias or non-conformity with ethical norms, he/she can appoint a different or additional reviewer. The same procedure could be used if reports from each reviewer are significantly different. Authors must address all comments and recommendations received from the reviewers within 20 days of receipt of the notification for minor revisions and within 45 days for major revisions. Revision process might comprise multiple rounds until editor is satisfied with all edits and is able to reach his/her decision to accept article for publishing. Also, the work can be rechecked for conformity with Publication ethical guidelines. Typically, this additional step is included in case of major changes to the manuscript. After completion of all procedures listed above, editorial office will issue letters stating one of the following decisions: ▪ article is rejected with clearly stated reasons for rejection; ▪ arcticle is accepted for publication.