Professional Publisher (Medium)
|Owner||eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd|
|Address||eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
|Copyright and Licensing||All content is subject to a Creative Commons Attribution license|
|Copyright and Licensing Policy||eLife is an open-access publication. All results are available to a worldwide audience, for free, immediately on publication. Everyone has the right to use the results without restriction (using a Creative Commons Attribution license). Citing, downloading, re-using, reproducing, re-purposing, and building on material published in eLife can be done without requesting permission from the authors or the publisher, provided full attribution to the authors is given. We also deposit all content into PubMed Central, as well as sites such as Mendeley, scribd, and Github, and we make article data openly available through an API.|
|Complaint policy||If authors believe that their article has been erroneously rejected by eLife, they should contact the editorial office. Appeals are first sent to the appropriate Senior editor for consideration. Any other complaints should also be directed to the editorial office in the first instance.|
|Publication charge link||https://reviewer.elifesciences.org/author-guide/fees|
|Publication charge policy||A fee of $3,000 is collected for published papers; however, authors with insufficient funding to pay the fee are eligible for a fee waiver.|
|OASPA Compliant OA Journals||One: eLife|
approx. number in 12 months
|The list of articles as they are published is available here: eLifesciences.org/search|
|Peer review policy||
eLife works to improve the process of peer review so that it more effectively conveys the assessment of expert reviewers to authors, readers and other interested parties. In the future we envision a system in which research is first published as a preprint and the outputs of peer review are the primary way research is assessed, rather than journal title.
Our editorial process produces two outputs: i) an assessment by peers designed to be posted alongside a preprint for the benefit of the readers; ii) detailed feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions and suggestions for improvement.
The assessment by peers includes an evaluation summary that captures the major conclusions of the review, and public reviews from each of the peer reviewers that outlines the strengths and weaknesses of the manuscript.
The detailed feedback is intended to help authors to revise and improve their preprint: for revised preprints that are accepted by eLife, the detailed feedback is published as part of the paper, along with the author response to the feedback. To learn more, please see “Peer Review: eLife implementing "Publish, then Review" model of publishing”.
Other features of the eLife peer-review process are: