Cappelen Damm Akademisk, Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing

Title	Cappelen Damm Akademisk, Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing
Class	Professional Publisher (Large)
URL	http://www.noasp.no
Owner	Cappelen Damm is a limited liability company registered in Norway and owned jointly and equally by the media houses Bonnier and Egmont.
Address	Cappelen Damm Akademisk 0055 Oslo Norway
Copyright and Licensing	https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/pubPoliciesBooks
Copyright and Licensing Policy	All NOASP content is released under open licenses from Creative Commons, most often a CC-BY license. However, depending on the circumstances or if an author wishes to publish with a different Creative Commons license, our team provides guidance in choosing the appropriate one.
Complaint email	https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/pubEthics
Complaint policy	Complaints may be submitted in writing to NOASP’s division leader Marte Ericsson Ryste via email: Marte.Ericsson.Ryste@cappelendamm.no.
Publication charge link	https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/pubPoliciesBooks https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/pubPoliciesJournals
Publication charge policy	Fees for publication of monographs and anthologies are determined on a case-by-case basis in advance, based on manuscript scope and production complexity. Our journals have varying policies regarding fees; some charge APCs, and others do not (see individual journal websites for more detailed information).
OASPA Compliant OA Journals	8
OA articles approx. number in 12 months	c. 125 journal articles per annum
OASPA Compliant OA Books	70
Peer review process	https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/pubPoliciesBooks https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/pubPoliciesJournals https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/pubEthics
Peer review policy	Manuscripts submitted to NOASP or a journal published by NOASP are subjected to external peer review. The decision to accept or reject a manuscript submitted to a journal is based on comments from at least two reviewers in a double-blind process. Editorials, book reviews and similar, are not necessarily peer-reviewed. Peer review for book manuscripts is single-blind, with one reviewer.