Member Record: Cappelen Damm Akademisk, Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing
| Title | Cappelen Damm Akademisk, Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing |
| Class |
Professional Publisher (Large) |
| URL | http://www.noasp.no |
| Owner | Cappelen Damm is a limited liability company registered in Norway and owned jointly and equally by the media houses Bonnier and Egmont. |
| Address | Cappelen Damm Akademisk 0055 Oslo Norway |
| Copyright and Licensing | https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/pubPoliciesBooks |
| Copyright and Licensing Policy | All NOASP content is released under open licenses from Creative Commons, most often a CC-BY license. However, depending on the circumstances or if an author wishes to publish with a different Creative Commons license, our team provides guidance in choosing the appropriate one. |
| Complaint email | https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/pubEthics |
| Complaint policy | Complaints may be submitted in writing to NOASP’s division leader Marte Ericsson Ryste via email: Marte.Ericsson.Ryste@cappelendamm.no. |
| Publication charge link | https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/pubPoliciesBooks https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/pubPoliciesJournals |
| Publication charge policy | Fees for publication of monographs and anthologies are determined on a case-by-case basis in advance, based on manuscript scope and production complexity. Our journals have varying policies regarding fees; some charge APCs, and others do not (see individual journal websites for more detailed information). |
| OASPA Compliant OA Journals | 8 |
| OA articles | c. 125 journal articles per annum |
| OASPA Compliant OA Books | 70 |
| Peer review process | https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/pubPoliciesBooks https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/pubPoliciesJournals https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/pubEthics |
| Peer review policy | Manuscripts submitted to NOASP or a journal published by NOASP are subjected to external peer review. The decision to accept or reject a manuscript submitted to a journal is based on comments from at least two reviewers in a double-blind process. Editorials, book reviews and similar, are not necessarily peer-reviewed. Peer review for book manuscripts is single-blind, with one reviewer. |